After a car accident, one of the biggest fears people face is whether they’ll receive enough compensation to cover hospital bills, lost wages, vehicle damage, and other unexpected costs. That concern grows when the insurance company comes back and suggests you may have been partly responsible for the crash.
At SAM LAW OFFICE LLC, we work with car accident victims regularly. We know how quickly these situations become stressful, and we know how much a clear understanding of the law can matter.
Here’s a quick look at how comparative negligence works in Illinois car accident claims:
Comparative negligence is a principle that applies when more than one party shares responsibility for a crash. Illinois courts follow a “modified comparative negligence” rule: you can recover damages as long as your fault is 50 percent or less. Fault is divided among everyone involved based on their actions leading up to the accident.
For example, one driver may have been speeding while another failed to yield. A court could determine that both drivers share responsibility for the collision.
This rule matters for injured drivers who worry that a small mistake on their part automatically bars them from any compensation. It does not.
Each party receives a percentage of fault based on their role in causing the accident. Consider this example:
These percentages reflect the available evidence and the circumstances surrounding the crash. Insurance adjusters, attorneys, accident reconstructionists, and, in some cases, courts all play a role in determining fault. Because those percentages directly affect compensation, insurance companies often scrutinize every available detail.
Evidence is often the deciding factor in a comparative negligence claim. Common forms of evidence include:
Many accident victims worry that the insurance company will simply blame them to reduce a payout. Thorough, well-documented evidence creates a clearer picture of what actually happened and supports a fair determination of responsibility.
Under Illinois’ comparative negligence rules, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault. If your total damages amount to $100,000 and you are found 20% responsible, your recovery would generally be reduced to $80,000.
Any reduction can feel discouraging, especially when bills are mounting. That said, being partially responsible does not mean losing your entire claim. Many injured drivers still recover significant compensation for:
Insurance companies frequently raise comparative negligence arguments to try to deny or minimize claims. Some assessments are reasonable; others overstate a driver’s level of responsibility. If you are being blamed for part of the accident:
You do not have to accept an unfair assessment of blame; you can push back.
Fault disputes can have a real impact on what you recover. The car accident attorneys at SAM LAW OFFICE LLC work closely with injury victims to review the evidence, challenge unfair fault assessments, and pursue the compensation they’re owed. Reach out now to schedule a free consultation.
After a car accident, one of the biggest fears people face is whether they'll receive enough compensation to cover hospital bills, lost wages, vehicle damage, and other unexpected costs. That…
An accident is frightening for anyone, but the fear can be greater when you have a pre-existing medical condition. Almost immediately, you're wondering if your injury claim is already at…
If you're considering a prenuptial agreement, you're likely looking for a way to protect yourself and the life you've worked hard to build as you enter marriage. After all, no…